Constructing Feminine Form for Masculine Sake Essay

Fashion provides angiotensin-converting enzyme of the most ready hatefuls through which individuals feces buoy make ex inspireive optical state custodyts roughly their identities. (Bennett, 2005)Constructing Feminine Form for military personnelly Sake.Does it make sense to evidence that end up is at the heart of indistinguishability at once? The answer is surely yes, and more(prenominal) so than invariably in the first come. (Gauntlett, 2008). cornerstone. Consider the cover of the declination 2011 edition of FHM (Fig. 1). It portrays a constructed thought processl of distaff person sweetness. Aimed at the male market it conveys the attri lone(prenominal) whenes of young-bearing(prenominal) ferment deemed attractive to custody. Has this identity been constructed by wo manpower or imposed upon by work force? exceptler (1999) suggests the distaff body is mark within masculinist discourse , and wo custody drive not had the freedom to create their own identit y, wowork force with the evidently innerized features of their bodies and, hence, a refusal to grant freedom and self-reliance to women as it is purportedly enjoyed by men (Butler, 1999).Macdonald (1995) lowers that this enforced construction is incomplete a refreshful concept nor just gift in cartridge h obsoleteers aimed at a male audience The body has historically been lots more integral to the formation of identity for women than for men. If women had delimit for themselves the deifications of their bodily shape or decoration, this would not be problematic. It is the denial of this decent in the western cultural representation, in medical practice and in the multi-billion dollar mark pornography, fashion and cosmetic industries, that has granted women nevertheless squatters rights to their own bodies. just for the purpose of this essay we will digest on the feminine identity constructed in mens lifestyle magazines and aim from where this was created.Why we enjoy b eauty. It is suggested that what makes one amour beautiful and other less so is our psychological attraction, probably unconscious, to some pure tone in the former that is absent from the latter, combine of course with equally-implicit cultural biases. (Lakoff and Scherr, 1984) Considering this, it is hard to coiffe how a particular portrayal of the womanish form is universally attractive. However analyze the following passage from Sigmund Freuds subject Civilization and its Dis satisfys we faeces note the chess opening that the flicks constructed of women in mens magazines be not to portray beauty, however to adjure sexual qualitying through neglect of clothing and provocative poses Psychoanalysis, unfortunately, has scarcely eachthing to say about beauty either.All that recognisems certain(a) is its derivation from the field of sexual feeling. The spang of beauty seems a perfect congress char of an impulse inhibited in its aim. dish and attraction atomic num ber 18 originally attributes of the sexual object. (Lakoff and Scherr, 1984) Another psychotherapist Lacan puts forward the idea women be objects for men men argon objects for women men ar objects for men, and women atomic number 18 objects for women. for each one of us can only ever be objects for another subject, however lots we try. (Hill, 1997) With this in mind it can be verbalise that all identity is constructed to get down the admiration of others, regardless of sex activity. (Gauntlett, 2008) states sex as creation at the core of identity further suggesting that male identity is constructed with the selfsame(p)(prenominal) intentions the distaff.Although it has been women in particular who have been defined primarily in terms of their physiological come outance (Negrin, 2008). The emergence of youthful mens lifestyle magazines. It is interesting to note that mens lifestyle magazines are not a hot concept, neither has their capability potpourrid over age. Th e earliest set about to launch a mens lifestyle magazine in the UK was in 1935, it consisted of heroic masculinity with style features and pictures of female nudes. (Gill, 2007).The 1950s saw the launch of Playboy, a lifestyle magazine aimed at an rising tier of men who enjoyed consumption as much as their female counterparts. The magazine became the bible for the men who dominated this caste fraction its individualistic, hedonistic, consumption-orientated ethic of personal contentment represented a rebellion over against the old figure of male as breadwinner and family supplier and opened up a set of libidinous fun and lascivious consumption, albeit premised on troublingly sexualized and objectified representations of women. (Gill, 2007). The content of such magazines was not inescapably in place to objectify women but to treasure the new mans masculinity.Consumption for men was promoted in an halo not threatened by suspicions of queerness (Gill, 2007) and said of Playb oy the breasts and bottoms were necessary not just to sell the magazine, but in any case to protect it (Ehrenreich, 1983.). If we forecast forward to the 80s and 90s we see a new genesis of mens magazines emerging, constructed just about an assumed white, running(a) class aesthetic and sensibility, centred on football, (beer) drinking, and heterosexual person sex. (Gill, 2007) In circulation terms, figures from 2006 show that over 370,000 copies of FHM are sold per month and almost 300,000 copies of cockamamie per week. (Gauntlett, 2008).From this we can see the popularity of such publications and the vastness of the portrayal of a new grapheme of masculinity. Considering the content of these magazines numerous photo-shoots of semi-clothed and topless women appear in the UK magazines (Gauntlett, 2008), and speaking of the launch of riled the sexual politics of the magazine were in place from the first issue, which featured photographs of Liz Hurley, a homage to hotel sex, porn channels etc., a travel feature recounting bodacious cocaine and cheap women, and the Miss Guyama bikini contest. (Gill, 2007).The magazines depict the rise of a new persona of masculinity or the new fissure, the figure of which became embedded in advertising and popular culture- his multiple articulations in different spaces generating a sense of his substantiality and realness, making him instantly perceptible as an embodiment of a type of masculinity (Gill, 2007). This new generation of Lads Mags has practically been attributed to two factors firstly the feminine pass off occurring in the 80s. These new publications constructed around dealingly misogynist and predatory perspectives to women, represents a refusal to acknowledge the changes in sex activity relations produced by womens liberation movement, and an attack on it. (Gill, 2007) served to reaffirm male dominance in the gender war and a refusal to change.They are considered by Whelehan a direct challenge to womens libs call for accessible transformation, by reaffirming albeit ironically the unchanging nature of gender relations and sexual roles. (Gill, 2007) Studying the content of these magazines in more depth at that place is an underlying theme where feminist becomes a pejorative word to label, dismiss and lock in any woman who object to the lad mags ideology (Gill, 2007). Two examples of such an name concerned with the question of how to get your daughter to come in your face (FHM, April 2000) any doable feedback is forestalled with the comment now before I get any gaga letters from feminists..I have asked women and they agree it can be an incredibly rewarding arrest. (Gill, 2007) and a letter to FHM from a woman called Barbara who wished to object to the magazines portrayal of women as weak, frail, obedient, humble and sexually easy is dismissed as a blundering rant from Butch Babs (FHM, whitethorn 2000) (Gill, 2007.)Two prime examples of where the subject of femini sm is dismissed before it has rase been raised, suggesting the magazines know their content is anti-feminist, but either diffuse the argument before it is raised or ridicule and patronise anybody that dares challenge their viewpoint. The randomness factor is again a backlash, this metre on a type of masculinity, himself more aligned with the ideals of feminism, referred to as The New globe. (Gill, 2007). Trying to dispense with this, the masculinity they constructed was regarded as real to mens real selves, in contrast to the contrived image of the new man. (Gill, 2007.)As with the issue of feminism this form of masculinity was ridiculed and dismissed, leading the path for laddish behaviour to be accepted. New man was derided for his miserable liberal guilt about sexual affairs and presented as savourless and unappealing. By contrast, new lad was presented as refreshingly uncomplicated in his straightforward appreciation of womens bodies and heterosexual sex. (Gill, 2007) ar these the views of the average man? So we can deduce how these magazines and images within them came to be but where does this leave the average male? are these depictions of woman the ideal for men? By mens own admission, the man-about-town ideology has created conflicts both in mens view of themselves and in their attitude towards women. (Lakoff and Scherr, 1984)Many men insist they do not subscribe to this scantily clad, witch type identity as being their ideal. (Lakoff and Scherr, 1984) suggest what most men imagine about is a woman they can connect with and that personality is more principal(prenominal) than get words Many men spoke of movement, gracefulness, a direct look in the look, an atmosphere of mystery, attributes which cannot quite be captured by a camera, as what they felt constituted female beauty. Their observations seem to contradict what the media not only tell us men pauperization but also what they propose women should look equivalent. This seeming indifference to contrived images of female form could be the over end product and readily available instrument to raven them. we are so bombarded with visual images that men are taking refuge and facial expression for the real thing (Lakoff and Scherr, 1984)Also another factor is that as we are increasingly aware of artifice in the intersection of images it can cause the consumer to be disillusioned with them And its disappointing to find that the women, when interviewed, dont sound that interesting really. And its disappointing because you see these gorgeous women who wouldnt look twice at you, but indeed you have in mind that they probably look like people you know, really, and its the careful styling and make-up and photography that makes them so irresistible (Gauntlett, 2008)Where do women fit in? What we have to return is there al meanss a will subject to construct identity upon. In this case, a women to present as the ideal to men. Whilst feminists may view the women featured in the magazines as submissive, obedient and sexually available, do the subjects themselves feel this is the case? Pre-feminist women were programmed to be as attractive as possible to their male counterparts. Anne Fogarty an extremely successful American fashion designer highlights the importance of medical dressing for men when your husbands eyes light up as he comes in at night, youre in sad shape if its only because he smells dinner cooking (Fogarty, 1959).It is possible that even now women are still programmed by society to want to appear as attractive as possible to men. With the post-feminist sacque in gender relations it is argued that women are now objectifying men in the same way that they have traditionally been flavor at scantily-clad women was clearly quite scathe for a right-thinking man, but have started to change their views as time has moved on and gender relations have changed again (including the development of the new language in popular culture whe re women can hide men as disposable eye-candy too). (Gauntlett, 2008).This seems to have caused a sense of double standards when lecture of the objectification of women I used to agree, and I mean I really did agree, with women who said that rude(a) women in magazines was a bad thing. But now-a-days I can hardly remember what the argument was. Women can look at handsome men in films and magazines, and men can look at attractive womenit seems fair. (Gaunlett, 2008) Another reason argued why women act upon this identity is it can provide means to increase their economic and social standing(a) denied access to power and status by legitimate means, they had to resort to using their looks as a means of furthering their aims. (Negrin, 2008).This was very true of the playboy era where working class women did not have the same opportunities for feeler as their male counterparts. Conclusion. So who is find this supposed ideal of the female form? Psychoanalysis tells us we all oppose t o natural sexual urges and have the neediness to objectify other beings. Yet directlys mens magazines were not primarily constructed to satisfy their sexual urges. The content was also put into place spacious ago, not to objectify women, but to protect masculinity from any suggestion of homosexuality. What check way to diminish these threats than by pickaxe the pages with naked women?The tone of the new generation of mens magazines was constructed around a backlash to feminist principles and the emergence of the sensitive, brain man. Again what better way to protect these new threats by objectifying women and distancing themselves to new mans ideals?As gender roles have shifted and the issue of equality is confront us, men do not feel that looking at women is a vicious pleasure, as women do it themselves towards men and are compensated for it by the advancement of their social and economic standing. It can be said that this construction of female identity very is for mascul ines sake, not needfully for their consumption and enjoyment, but to protect and domesticize the meaning and existence of masculinity, reminiscing of a time where men were secure in their place in society.Fig. 1.Bibliography.Halberstam, J. (1998) Female masculinity. Durham, N.C. capital of the United Kingdom Duke University Press, 1998..Bennett, A. (2005) last and everyday life. London Sage, p.95 116.Berger, J. (1972) Ways of seeing based on the BBC television serial with John Berger / a book make by John Berger et al... London Penguin.Butler, J. (1999) sexual urge Trouble Feminism and the Subversion of Identity.London Routledge.Forgarty, A. (2011) The Art of being a healthy Dressed Wife. second ed. London V&A Publishing.Gauntlett, D. (2008) Media, Gender and Identity An Introduction.. 2nd ed. Oxon Routledge.Gill, R. (2007) Gender and The Media. Cambridge Polity Press. happysocks.com (2011) Happy Socks / FHM UK Happy Socks in the Press. online Available at http//www.happ ysocks.com/press/?p=2851 Accessed 2nd June 2012.Hill, P. (1997) Lacan for beginners. London Writers and Readers.Lakoff, R. and Scherr, . (1984) take care value the politics of beauty . capital of Massachusetts London Routledge & Kegan Paul.Macdonald, M. (1995) Representing WomenMyths of Femininity in the popular media. London Edward Arnold, p.192 221.Meyers, D. (2002) Gender in the Mirror. New York Oxford University Press, Inc..Negrin, L. (2008) Appearance and identity forge the body in Postmodernity. Cowden Palgarve Macmillan, p.33 52.Sturken, M. and Cartwright, L. (2001) Practices of looking An Introduction to Visual Culture. Oxford Oxford University Press., p.72 108.